Peace, Love, and Joy

SACRILEGE: Secret Muslims in Malaysia Spit Out Host

July 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Read about it here.

Act of Reparation to the Most Blessed Sacrament

With that most profound respect

which divine Faith inspires,

O my God and Saviour Jesus Christ,

true God and true man,

I adore Thee,

and with my whole heart I love Thee,

hidden in the most august Sacrament of the Altar,

in reparation of all the irreverences,

profanations, and sacrileges, that I,

to my shame, may have until now committed,

as also for all those

that have been committed against Thee,

or that may be ever committed for the time to come.

I offer to Thee,

therefore, O my God,

my humble adoration, not indeed,

such as Thou art worthy of,

nor such as I owe Thee,

but such, at least,

as I am capable of offerings;

and I wish that I could love Thee

with the most perfect love

of which rational creatures are capable.

In the meantime,

I desire to adore Thee now and always,

not only for those Catholics

who do not adore or love Thee,

but also so supply the defect,

and for the conversion of all heretics,

schismatics, lebertines,

atheists, blasphemers,

sorcerers, Mahomedans,

Jews, and idolaters.

Ah! yes, my Jesus,

mayest Thou be known,

adored, and loved by all

and may thanks be continually given to Thee

in the most holy and august Sacrament!

Our Lady of Reparations, pray for us!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

The Rescue of St. Placidus

July 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

St. Maurus Rescues St. Placidus

St. Maurus Rescues St. Placidus

When St. Benedict was establishing his first monastic community at Subiaco, parents would bring their children to live with him. Two different Roman patricians brought their sons to become monks at Subiaco. One of them was the future St. Placidus (age 8) while the other was the future St. Maurus.

One morning, St. Benedict asked St. Placidus to go and fetch water from a nearby river. The boy went to the river with a jug and began to fill it. Yet the current in the river was so strong that it pulled Placidus in. The boy began to shout for help, but nobody would come to his aid. It was clear that he would soon be taken underneath the current of the river and drown.

St. Benedict, who was several miles away, heard the boy’s screams and told Maurus to run and pull Placidus out of the river. Maurus ran as fast as he could and, without realizing, walked on water. He pulled out Placidus out by his hair and then brought the frightened boy back to the monastery.

When the monks began to wonder how this miracle had occurred and began to attribute it to Maurus’s, Placidus replied that was not the way that it had happened. Rather, he had seen the abbot’s cloak overshadow him and that it was St. Benedict that had rescued him. What this meant, of course, was that the rescue would not have been possible without St. Benedict’s prayers.

Sts. Placidus and Maurus are two of the first disciples of St. Benedict and are highly venerated in the Benedictine Order. When they grew up, St. Benedict sent Maurus to establish Benedictine monasteries in France. St. Placidus was sent to Sicily for the same reason and that is where he suffered martyrdom.

Our Lady of the Angels, pray for us!

St. Benedict, pray for us!

St. Maurus, pray for us!

St. Placidus, pray for us!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

The Alphonsianum Blog

July 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

St. Alphonsus Liguori

St. Alphonsus Liguori

One of my all time favorite saints is Alphonsus Liguori (1696-1787), founder of the Redemptorists and Doctor of the Church. He was also one of the most prolific writers in church history. He left behind more than 111 books at the time of his death.

For many years, many of his ascetical works were available in cheap paperback editions that were published in South Dakota throughout the 1970s and 1980s. These editions are becoming harder and harder to come by.

Yet a Son of the Most Holy Redeemer (FSSR) has done us a great favor by making St. Alphonsus’s works available over the internet. Visit the Alphonsianum blog here  and learn from one of the greatest Doctors of the Church.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,

St. Benedict’s Summer Feast Day

July 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

St. Benedict, Patriarch of Monks

St. Benedict, Patriarch of Monks

When I first acquired my Benedictine breviary almost two years ago, I opened the second volume and noticed something really odd.  My name day (St. Alexius) falls on July 17th, but the breviary said nothing about it. Rather, it mentioned that it was ferial day during the Octave. It turned out that St. Benedict had a feast day on July 11th.

I decided that I would research this second feast day since the only one I knew about was on March 21. And here are some interesting things that I found out:

July 11th is the solemn commemoration of St. Benedict within the Benedictine Order. On the Tridentine Calendar (in use until 1969), this was a first class feast day in all Benedictine abbeys and had its own Octave. The reason why this does occur on March 21 is that this feast day frequently falls during Lent and solemn commemoration is not possible if the feast day falls during Holy Week.

The historical reason for why St. Benedict’s summer feast day falls on July 11 is that on this day, his relics were translated from Monte Cassino to St. Benoit-sur-Loire in France.  There are many stories about why the relics ended up there. Some believe that they were stolen from Monte Cassino. Others maintain that they were taken there during a period of warfare in Italy. Even today, scholars are debating whether St. Benedict’s relics were removed at all and where they reside. (I can think of similar claims about the body of St. George. I will talk about this in another post.)

Regardless of the facts, there have always been two feasts in honor of St. Benedict. March 21 commemorates his repose in the Lord and his birthday in heaven, while July 11 honors him as the father and patriarch of monks.

An interesting side note is that the second feast day of St. Benedict would not have ended up in the breviary had it not been for St. Robert Bellarmine. According to historians, Bellarmine was editing the Roman Breviary in accordance with the decrees of the Council of Trent. Of course, this meant editing the Roman Calendar. A debate arose between the Italian and French Benedictines about which feast day of St. Benedict to include. Bellarmine settled the problem by writing down both March 21 and July 11 on the calendar as commemorations of St. Benedict. So it has remained to this day.

Our Lady of the Angels, pray for us!

St. Benedict, pray for us!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Obama Pledges to Reduce Abortions

July 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

According to Reuters, Barack Hussein Obama has told the Holy Father that he would like to reduce the number of abortions that take place every year in the United States. President Obama’s plan is to reduce abortion by making the economic circumstances better for those women that usually go to the abortion mills. His Holiness said that he was satisfied with the audience that he had with President Obama.

It seems to me that His Holiness has the wool pulled over his eyes. President Obama is a wolf in sheep’s clothing when it comes to pro-life. He is a man who is against everything that the Pope and the Church stand for. How is it possible that His Holiness can be satisfied with a meeting like this? What if nothing happens with the proposals? What if the words are just words?

In the past, Popes did not stand idly by and shake hands with heads of state whom they viewed to be a threat to the Church. Pope Pius XI did not meet with Hitler nor did Pope Pius XII meet with Stalin and discuss the problems which Catholics under those respective regimes faced. These popes knew danger when they saw it and they stayed away while still issuing encyclicals that the urged people to resist the Communists and Nazis. They knew better than to walk into the lion’s mouth because the lion would clamp down on them and kill them.

I do think that now is as good a time as any to pray for the Pope and for the conversion of the President. 

Our Lady of the Angels, pray for us!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Catholicism in China: Two Churches, No Solution

July 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Chinese Martyrs

The Chinese Martyrs

As an ESL teacher, I have frequent opportunities to work with priests and religious from other countries. Recently, there has been a spate of religious sisters and priests arriving from various parts of China. Most of them come to the United States in order to obtain Master’s Degrees in history, theology, or any other field that would prove useful to them back home in China.

For a long time, I wondered if they had been brought to the United States by the Cardinal Kung Foundation (a network that supports the underground Chinese Catholic Church) or the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Organization  (a group loyal to the Communist Party and not recognized by the Vatican). I found out that most belonged to the latter group.

As with everything else in Communist countries, the position of religious bodies has always been extremely difficult. In Russia, for example, two different Orthodox Churches existed at the same time:  the Moscow Patriarchate (the official Russian Orthodox Church) and numerous underground groups that have since come into the open.

The underground Church in Russia was formed by believers, who did not recognize the reforms of Metropolitan (later Patriarch) Sergius and his collaboration with the government. Therefore, they spent most of their lives and lived their faith underground, whiel the Patriarchate continued on its merry way.  The truth of the matter is that the Moscow Patriarchate did not choose to collaborate with the Communist regime. Rather, it was faced with an extremely difficult choice. Either to continue resisting the Communists or to acquiesce and gain some freedom. Russian American journalist Serge Schmemann put the question even more succinctly in his book, Echoes of a Native Land: ”If you were a Russian Orthodox bishop which would you choose, signing a decree of loyalty to the state or having one thousand priests executed in the Gulag?”

The question put before believers in China is similar: “Swear fealty to the Communist party and the CCPA or face martyrdom in the underground Church.” Countless Chinese Catholics have chosen the latter course rather than swear fealty to a party that has essentially made the Church a puppet in their hands. Countless hundreds and thousands have been martyred for their faith. Many have been tortured in prison and others are still languishing in labor camps. As St. Paul wrote so eloquently to the Hebrews, these Chinese martyrs are part of a cloud of witnesses that grows greater and greater by the day. Few people realize how dire the situation in China really is for believers that choose not to attend CCPA services.

The most difficult thing, of course, is trying to find some solution to this problem. It seems to me that the one thing standing in the way of reconciliation is the Communist government. Without it, the CCPA will no longer have a rationale for existing. Rather, the end of the Communist Party would mean that negotiations would take place between those that are on both sides of the fence.

After the collapse of Communism in Russia, something similar happened. The Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) began negotiations with the Moscow Patriarchate for full unity. These negotiations were fraught with tension, but Full Communion was achieved between the Churches in May, 2007 with a solemn service at the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. Since then, the ROCOR has become incorporated into the larger structure of the Patriarchate and the schism no longer exists.

Of course, any solution to the problem in the Church in China will have to be taken up by the Vatican. Past popes have made efforts toward easing tensions, but these tensions still continue. Underground believers are still blackmailed into not speaking out while the CCPA continues to be seen as the official face of Catholicism in China.

It is time for us to pray to Our Lady of China to a solution to this problem. In God’s time, the schism will be healed. Yet if we do not pray, it will not happen.

Our Lady of China, pray for us!

Holy Martyrs of China, pray for us!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,

Latin Pronunciation: Traditio Answers

July 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The following was found on the Traditio website:

For teaching Latin, the Classical pronunciation, representing the height of the Classical period (50 B.C.-A.D. 50), is preferred. For chant and religious services, the Italianate (after modern Italian) is generally preferred, though not universally. The Austro-Germanic (after modern German), for example, is frequently heard on recordings from Germanic countries.

These are not competing theories, by the way. There is no question that the Italianate represents a much later period than the Classical. It does work better for mediaeval hymns, which would not rhyme in the Classical pronunciation. An argument could be made that the Classical more accurately represents the pronunciation in the time of Christ than the Italianate, which represents a pronunciation at least a millennium later.

Personally, I tend to err on the side of received pronunciation rather than scientific theory. If ecclesiastical Latin is what the Church has used for centuries, then who are we to say that classical Latin is better?

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

Tree Virgin Mary in Ireland

July 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

 

From the Associated Press:

DUBLIN (AP) — Thousands of Irish Catholics have flocked this week to a County Limerick church to pray at the stump of a recently cut willow that many observers say, has the silhouette of the Virgin Mary.

The phenomenon at St. Mary’s parish church in Rathkeale, population 3,000 or so, harkens back to decades when Catholic devotion and pilgrimages were the dominant feature of rural life in Ireland.

Some are tying the fervor for Rathkeale’s “Holy Stump” to Ireland’s stunning economic decline over the past year.

“People have been crying out for something good to happen. And this is all good for the soul,” said Noel White, who has been overseeing a church project to cut down trees dangerously overhanging the neighboring school playground.

When one willow was felled near the church entrance Monday, he said, a major branch cracked off and made “a funny shape.” One worker cut through the stump at a near-vertical angle, revealing a wooden relief that inspires some to see the Virgin Mary.

“One lad beside the one who’d made the cut immediately saw the outline of Our Lady and blessed himself. It really is unreal. Every one of us could see it,” he said.

The workman who made the cut, Anthony Reddin, said he doesn’t see the Virgin Mary.

“I see it as the grain of a tree myself,” he said.

Nonetheless, word of mouth brought about 100 to inspect and pray at the stump that first night. Numbers swelled to several hundred the next night. By Wednesday, more than a thousand came and went as a makeshift shrine of candles, rosaries and miniature statues of Mary grew. The praying continued past 2 a.m. Thursday.

The parish priest is away on vacation. His summer replacement, the Rev. Willie Russell, is not impressed. He says locals are letting their imagination run wild and threatening to violate the commandment, “Thou shalt not worship a false God.”

“It’s just a tree. You don’t worship a tree,” Russell said.

The priest said he saw no harm in saying Hail Mary prayers at the spot — so long as the faithful don’t actually find themselves praying to the stump itself. “I don’t believe in idolatry. That would be the danger,” he said.

The County Limerick diocese of the church said it viewed the stump with “great skepticism.”

“While we do not wish in any way to detract from devotion to Our Lady, we would also wish to avoid anything which might lead to superstition,” the diocese said in a statement.

White said he didn’t understand the church’s distinction between its age-old love of statues and this natural discovery.

“We pray in front of statues which are marble and chalk. What’s the difference if it’s timber?” he said.

Not all find what they come to see. Sometimes, the crowds prove too great to get a good look. Others wonder if the lighting has to be just right, or the wood dry and not damp.

Irish Catholics saw images of the Virgin Mary during Ireland’s last recession in the mid-1980s, when thousands prayed at village statues believed to gesture, nod or even hover.

The stump has proven a boon for the local economy, with the curious traveling from neighboring counties to light votive candles and say rosaries — and sample the local pubs and shops.

Rathkeale shopkeeper Seamus Hogan is leading a petition drive to deter village authorities from uprooting and removing the stump, as they originally planned to do Wednesday. The petition has more than 2,000 signatures — and White’s tree-cutters have gotten the message.

“We won’t be removing the stump. We’d remove it at our peril,” White said.

The following article raises the following question: “When is an apparition not an apparition?” It seems to me that there are too many people in this world who would like to believe that the Blessed Mother appeared to them in one form or another.

Several years ago, there was a highway sign somewhere in the United States on which people thought that they saw Our Lady of Guadalupe. In another instance, there was a grilled cheese sandwich in which someone else saw the Blessed Virgin Mary and auctioned said sandwich on the internet. After weeks of mass hysteria, the respective situations quieted down and people went back to their normal lives. Who is not to say that the same will not happen in Ireland?

I remember reading a biography of St. Bernadette several years ago in which the author discussed the various satanic phenomena that took place around the same time as the apparitions at Lourdes. Several children in the area of Lourdes also claimed to have seen the Blessed Mother, but their accounts clearly showed that they had not seen her at all. Their behavior after the apparitions also clearly contrasted with that of Bernadette, which gave the apparitions at Massabielle more credence.

It should not come as a surprise to us that Satan can disguise himself as an angel of light to deceive the faithful. He’s done it before and he can do it again. Only time will tell if the tree stump is what people believe it to be. Our Lord will show us in his own good time.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

The Sedes Don’t Get It, The Pope Does

July 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Holy Father in front of St. Peters

The Holy Father in front of St. Peter's

I have been away from this blog for two months attending to other duties, but I have decided to return because there are many issues that I would like to address here. As the saying goes, here goes nothing…

As some of you know, I like to track what is going on over in the traditionalist sedevacantist circles. I used to attend sedevacantist parishes before I saw the light and united with Rome, so I still retain an interest in what their bishops and parish priests discuss.

One of these bishops is Daniel A. Dolan, who was consecrated by Bishopo Mark Pivarunas. Bishop Dolan resides and serves at St. Gertude the Great. Every Sunday, his sermons are made available to a larger listening public via that site. When he isn’t available, one of his assistants preaches.

Certain traditionalists believe that Bishop Dolan is the best preacher since Archbishop Fulton Sheen, the great Catholic communicator of some fifty years ago. For the most part, no real comparisons can be made between the two. While Sheen speaks with the tremendous authority of one under Rome and Holy Mother church, Dolan preaches on the basis of his own theological opinions and those of other sedevacantist theologians. While his preaching contains Catholic truths and the essence of the Catholic faith, what it does not include is the same fiery charity that was so characteristic of Archbishop Sheen.

Another poin that I would like to make about Bishop Dolan is that he frequently says in his sermons that his parishioners and those others in the traditionalist movement are the last Catholics in the world. I’m afraid that Bishop Dolan is sorely mistaken if he truly believes this. In fact, this is the same sort of thing that was being served up by Francis Schuckardt to his congregations in Spokane, Washington before he was unceremoniously thrown out because of sexual misconduct with his seminarians.  

The truth of the matter is that the sedevacantists are in schism from the Church. Whatever they may wish to believe about their own position, they are not in union with the Apostolic See. Of course, this fact carries with it tremendous consequences for them and for those that wish to attend their chapels.

First of all, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass that is offered at these places is not licit. This means that they are not legal in the eyes of the Church. This also goes for the Sacrament of Confession since a priest with suspended faculties cannot absolve people in the confessional. If one were to investigate the situation carefully, one would find that the whole sedevacantist enterprise is a stack of cards with nothing holding it up except the theory that the current Pope is a heretic and that we do not owe him any obedience whatsoever.

The truth, of course, is much more complex and different than what the sedes believe. First of all, Bellarmine stated that a majority of cardinals and the laity would be responsible for kicking a heretical pope out of office and declaring an interregnum until a new pope is chosen by the College of Cardinals. Nothing like this has happened since Vatican II. Only a small minority of believers have left the Church because they saw the crisis for what it was. Yet it would have been much better if they had stayed and fought from within. When they left, they essentially said to the Vatican and the Holy Father, “We didn’t leave the Roman Catholic Church, the Roman Catholic Church left us.”

The current ecclesiastical situation in the Church is nothing to smile about, but it does not mean that we should pick up stakes and leave at the first opportunity. Rather, it means that we should stay and fight the more for tradition to return. God has worked great miracles if enough people are willing to pray and sacrifice for them. Who are we to say that He will not do so again?

Another problem I have with the sedevacantist thesis is that Christ made certain promises to St. Peter. He told Him that He would build His Church on Him and that the gates of hell would not prevail against Her. No matter how many times heretics and schismatics have tried to break down the doors of the Church and to make Her something that She isn’t, they have always failed. Why have they failed? Why haven’t they managed to succeed? Because they are powerless in the light of Christ’s promises to St. Peter and we all know that God means it when He makes a promise. He does not renege on what He says. He can’t.

It seems to me that Pope Benedict XVI understands the present situation much better than some of his predecessors. As a theologian, he knows what Catholic theologians have said about such things as sedevacantism. As the Supreme Pontiff, he knows and understands the present crisis in the Church. It is not for nothing that he is working so hard to heal the breach and to make things better. If only the traditionalists would see him for the man that he is and not the monster that they have been told about for so many years. The truth can set people free if only we are open to see it.

Our Lady of the Angels, pray for us!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Our Lord, Judas, and Myself

April 19, 2009 · 1 Comment

Our Lord Betrayed by Judas (Caravaggio)

Our Lord Betrayed by Judas (Caravaggio)

Betrayal is a common human emotion. When the people closest to us do things that they were not supposed to do, we feel hurt and angry. We wonder why they did what they did and how it will impact our relationship with them. In evewhetry single relationship, there always exists that temptation to betray the other. Whether by gossip or some other action, all of  us are liable to betray those that we love. When we do, it is something that is very difficult for us to live with.

When Our Lord was betrayed by Judas, He was not surprised. He knew that the betrayal was coming. He had even predicted who His betrayer was at the Last Supper. The moment came when Judas arrived with the guards and other members of the ruling classes. Yet Our Lord did nothing. He merely presented Himself to Judas and said to those who asked who He was, “I am He.”

Our Lord is betrayed countless times by each human being living on this earth. Whether through a life of sin or committing grave sins, each one of us is guilty of betraying Him in some way. None of us can escape from this fact precisely because it is such an ever-present reality in our lives.

This morning, I went to Mass at my local parish and received Communion. What should have been a moment that I eagerly awaited became a moment of great guilt. As Our Lord lay on my tongue, I felt pangs of guilt and revulsion. Yes, He was there with me, but He had come to judge me for the sins that I had committed.

When I went to make my thanksgiving, I made thanks for Him coming to me and yet I could feel His stern gaze. I had dared to betray Him countless times during the week yet I had come to the banquet and received Him. I now knew and understood what St. Paul had said so eloquently in one of his epistles, which I will paraphrase, ”He who eats the bread and drinks of the cup does so to his own condemnation and judgment.”

It became clear to me as I knelt there in church that I was no better than Judas and the pharisees that Our Lord condemned. I have lived a pious life, yes, but have ever really understood how much my sins impact the world and how each one of them is a betrayal? How every act of disobedience to lawful authority on my part hurts Him? How much blood and water gushed  forth from His side because of me? How the nails pierced Him because of my sins?

I think about the Passion many times during the day, but I do not believe that I am truly living His message. Receiving Him consistently in the Eucharist is a true privilege and gift. It is not something for me to take lightly anymore. If I am to serve Him with all of my heart and with all of my soul, then I will have to repent of my sins. No act of contrition no matter how sincere can make up for the absolution that I would receive in the confessional. While the act itself may repair damage, it will not spare me the judgment.

I need to be cleansed from my sins in order to love Him more. If I die in them, I most certainly will not see my Lord as a merciful father, but as a just judge. It is this realization that I came out of Mass with today. It is sober and real, but it is the truth. No matter how much it may hurt me not to receive Him, it would hurt Him even more if I did in a state of sin. That I cannot do anymore.

Our Lady of the Angels, pray for us!

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,